![]() This will be welcome news for colorists wanting greater effects fidelity from project import. Choosing AAF generates a file for Media Composer that can be directly relinked to the media you output from Resolve.įurthermore, when importing AAF files, Resolve now reads a variety of video transitions (dip to color, wipes, and iris transitions), composite modes, and transform parameters into your session. ![]() A new Format popup in the Export Session dialog (that appears when you click the Export button in the Conform page) lets you choose whether to export XML or AAF (previously it only expoted XML). Top of the list is is enhanced AAF round trip support. Most are subtle, but welcome additions to a variety of users. But, not content to rest on their laurels, DaVinci has eliminated a decimal place and announced DaVinci Resolve 8.1, with even more feature enhancements. So when a client moves, boots up and requests a new DHCP IP, it will broadcast, hit the Layer 3 device, the layer 3 device would see that the DHCP is on the different segment and the DHCP would see the request is from a different IP Segment and would provide them with a new IP from the appropriate scope.It seems like just yesterday that DaVinci released version 8.0.1 with its new color balance control interface, and DaVinci Lite, a free 2-node and HD-limited version. So for the scenario stated above, all they would need to do is have 2 physical segments (one for each building), 2 different IP ranges (1 per segment), 2 scopes on the DHCP server, and have the layer 3 device configured with a DHCP Helper IP Address. Because of this, a superscope will help transition to a new scope using a different IP range for the same single physical segment. Using a superscope, you can have multiple logical IP ranges within the same physical segment and be able to hand out IP addresses even if the DHCP’s NIC does not belong to that same IP address range. There is a way to get around this, and that is by using a superscope. So if you have 3 different IP ranges on the same physical segment, you’ll need 3 different NICs. One way to get around this, is by adding another NIC that contains that same IP range. When you have different IP ranges on the same segment, the DHCP server will return a NACK because that DHCP server’s NIC is not on that segment. Because of this, you only need to use regular scopes, as the DHCP server will see that it was requested from a different segment. That Layer 3 device will be configured with a DHCP IP (DHCP Helper IP) that is located in a different segment. In an environment where you have multiple segments segmented by a Layer 3 device, each of those segments will have a different IP Range of course. My explanation of superscopes vs scope(s): I’m assuming that the reason is because they have a Superscope configured and not multiple scopes, but I have yet to come across Superscopes in the field. It keeps trying to grab an address from its original location. ![]() Laptops are not able to obtain a new IP Address when going from one building to another. They are using the 50/50 scenario and configuring half of the addresses on one server and half on the other. The real-world scenario that I’m running into is that a client configured a single Superscope for all 175+ address ranges they have (scattered all over the country) and there are only two DHCP servers. One of my coworkers had an issue described below: I wanted to provide a short description of when you would use a superscope vs scope(s) in a real-world scenario.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |